<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
   <title>Is HTML5 Ready Yet? | Comment Feed</title>
   <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/</link>
   <description>Comments on the HTML5 Release Schedule</description>
   <language>en-us</language>
   <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:12:28 -0400</pubDate>
   <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:12:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
   <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
   <generator>CC Feed Generator</generator>
   <managingEditor>html5@jcornelius.com (J Cornelius)</managingEditor>
   <webMaster>html5@jcornelius.com (J Cornelius)</webMaster>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Tim</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#860</link>
     <description><![CDATA[So ... if HTML5 isn't going anywhere, why is Google using the shit out of it?  

Unless you're suggesting that Google isn't going anywhere either.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:07:19 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#860</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from agazamon</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#859</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Wahe Guru willing, HTML5 will be ready sooner than everybody expects.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:03:58 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#859</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from James Davis</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#858</link>
     <description><![CDATA[I'm siding with Tanner as well -- Ant sounds like an idiot, especially his comments about Flash.  Flash is a fucking joke, it's worthless and it won't be around for much longer.  As far as Apple's "Stab ad Adobe" -- no shit.  The future of web authoring is a BUSINESS it would behoove competitors to cut one and other out of the picture .... However I believe Adobe and Apple will merge at some point in the future -- be that future distant or immediate.

Ant is a douche bag.  The real concern of designers like Ant is the fear that the simplification of HTML will make it easier to learn and they'll be out of a job ... so they WANT to shit all over it.  ]]></description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:41:09 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#858</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Whocares</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#857</link>
     <description><![CDATA[The source code was fun to read especially inside the <!--  tags]]></description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:29:45 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#857</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Tony Rivas</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#851</link>
     <description><![CDATA[I just found that HTML5 video uses flash as backup, how lame!. And you have to upload 2 o 3 videos instead of one. Lame again!.
Please, someone put a photo of HTML5 on the fail blog.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:48:43 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#851</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Ant</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#849</link>
     <description><![CDATA[HTML5 is a complete joke.
Anyone who says it'll revolutionize anything knows absolutely nothing about the toppic. 
As far as replacing Flash, lol, that's just delusional. 
But it will have it's place it just won't be revolutionary, and I predict the timeframe between HTML 5 and HTML 6 will be relatively short.

HTML 5 is being marketed by crap companies like APPLE as a revolution, but it's nothing but a business stab at Adobe.

And to all people claiming that theory, I can honestly say you know absolutely nothing about the subject and future will hold your biggest lesson.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:56:46 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#849</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Jeff</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#848</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Anyone named John Dixon should probably do his home work and shut his mouth.  Tanner's right.  With the growing number of people contributing to HTML5 and choosing to incorporate parts of it as it evolves, the release date will come years before 2022.  YouTube already utilizes it, Safari and Chrome are almost 100% compatible with it.  Dixon is just a naysayer who probably couldn't design a website any better than a toddler.

#JohnDixon {
position: absolutleyLame;
top: he'll never get there;
bottom: home sweet home;
padding: he's fat;
skills: 0;
}

'skills' is a new HTML5 thing, Safari supports it.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:08:24 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#848</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from John Dixon</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#847</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Anyone who is interested in HTML5 and it's REAL release date should look at the number at the top of this page.

John Dixon
Web Designer since 1997]]></description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:43:20 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#847</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Tanner Campbell</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#844</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Also anyone who is interested in HTML5 and it's REAL release date should watch this.

http://bit.ly/aIXEdF]]></description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:45:04 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#844</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Tanner Campbell</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#843</link>
     <description><![CDATA[HTML5 is 100% a move forward.  Anyone not supporting this move, and not taking the time to learn it as it evolves, is shooting themselves in the foot.  

There seems to be a lot of argument about it's need ... to that I say: HTML4 is HEAVY and STRUGGLING if we want to take web and mobile authoring to the next level, we've got to evolve the language.  Just like we evolved from HTML 3.2

Tanner Campbell
Web Designer since 1999]]></description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:36:54 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#843</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from billfg</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#842</link>
     <description><![CDATA[If you look at the source code, you will see that the <time> tag is used, which is an HTML5 tag.
http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_time.asp
]]></description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:23:58 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#842</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Lee McColl Sylvester</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#841</link>
     <description><![CDATA[STABLE in ALL browsers? That's never happened and never will. Wait until then? No way! I'm gonna do what I can where I can and enjoy it. Life's too short.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:32:32 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#841</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Cornface</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#840</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Sure some browsers support some HTML 5 tags ans JS but righ tnow it is a broken specification and shouldn't be taken seriously in ANY business application right now. It's not ready as a stable implementation and won't be for a while. Sorry people, full HTML5 won't be widespread stable in browser for quite some time. If you have been developing at all in your life then you'd know to wait until the entire spec is implemented in FULL ans STABLE in ALL browsers before you'd use it in any sort of important application.   Accept it.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:37:44 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#840</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Beth</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#838</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Take a look at this bug: http://tiny.cc/78rsa

Clients are beginning to request websites in html5 and this is what we have to work with???]]></description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:25:09 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#838</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Super Future Guy</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#836</link>
     <description><![CDATA[I already created HTML 7.  It only works in my customer browser.  No, you can't see it.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:35:51 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#836</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Henry Thomas Michael Leo the 5th.</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#835</link>
     <description><![CDATA[Many of you should learn how to write a coherent sentence before writing anything online.  HTML 5 is not going to correct your poor English or suddenly make your paragraphs relevant.  

You should all respect Mr. Cornelius and his fine work here.  If Soul Train was still filming, we would have no idea how long a wait HTML5 is.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:40:17 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#835</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Steve</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#834</link>
     <description><![CDATA[html5 {
    position: indifferent;
    display: eventually;
    overflow: 5yrs;
    padding: 3yrs;
    background: #eeeeek url('http://ishtml5readyyet.com/') repeat-daily;
}]]></description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:32:45 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#834</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from ranx</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#833</link>
     <description><![CDATA[thats BULL]]></description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:02:22 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#833</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from Jacob Kelley</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#832</link>
     <description><![CDATA[I am excited for HTML5, though it will take forevvveeerrrr.]]></description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:31:11 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#832</guid>
    </item>
       <item>
     <title>Comment from BS</title>
     <link>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#831</link>
     <description><![CDATA["NO is a negative word. it doesn't say much but it means a lot."

You ask anybody who has just received medical test results for a terminal illness and they'll tell you - NO is a positive word. it doesn't say much but it means a lot.

"and why am i posting here?"

I haven't a clue - perhaps you're mad! ]]></description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:14:01 -0400</pubDate>
     <guid>http://ishtml5readyyet.com/#831</guid>
    </item>
    <atom:link href="http://ishtml5readyyet.com/feed.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
 </channel>
</rss>
